Claims Rx - NORCAL Mutual Insurance Company
 

Maternal Mortality, Liability and Safety Risks

CME Information

Sponsored by:
NORCAL Mutual Insurance Company, a member of the NORCAL Group. The NORCAL Group of companies includes NORCAL Mutual Insurance Company, Medicus Insurance Company, NORCAL Specialty Insurance Company and FD Insurance Company.

NORCAL Mutual Insurance Company is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

For questions, please call the Risk Management Department at 855.882.3412.

Method and Medium

To obtain CME credit, read the article then take the quiz and fill out the evaluation form. You can print or email your CME certificate from this application.

Please complete and submit the online quiz by the expiration date indicated below:

Original Release Date: July 15, 2017

Expiration Date: August 1, 2019

Learning Objectives

By reviewing medical professional liability claims and/or emerging topics in healthcare risk management, this enduring material series will support your ability to:

  • Assess your practice for risk exposures.
  • Apply risk management best practices that increase patient safety and reduce medical professional liability claims.

Target Audience

All clinicians, healthcare staff and administrators who serve pregnant patients or who are involved in perinatal care.

Credit Designation Statement

NORCAL Mutual Insurance Company designates this enduring material for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Disclosure Policy

As an ACCME accredited provider, NORCAL Mutual Insurance Company requires planners, reviewers or authors who influence or control the content of a CME activity to disclose financial relationships (of any amount) they have had with commercial interests associated with this CME activity during the year preceding publication of the content.

Any identified conflicts of interest are resolved prior to the commencement of the activity.

Disclosures

Individuals involved in the planning, reviewing or execution of this activity have indicated they have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Editor

Mary-Lynn Ryan

Risk Management Specialist,
NORCAL Mutual

Content Advisors

Sandra L. Beretta, MD

Chair, NORCAL Mutual, FD Insurance and Medicus


Patricia A. Dailey, MD

Director, NORCAL Mutual, FD Insurance and Medicus


Rebecca J. Patchin, MD

Director, NORCAL Mutual, FD Insurance and Medicus


William G. Hoffman, MD

Family Practice Content Advisor


Dustin Shaver

Vice President, Risk Management,
NORCAL Mutual


Neil Simons

Vice President, Product Development,
NORCAL Mutual


Paula Snyder, RN, CPHRM

Regional Manager, Risk Management,
NORCAL Mutual


John Resetar

Claims Specialist,
NORCAL Mutual


Andrea Koehler, JD

Counsel,
NORCAL Mutual

Planner

Shirley Armenta

CME Program Lead,
NORCAL Mutual

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Maternal Death as a Result of Hemorrhage
  3. Identifying and Planning for High-Risk Patients
  4. Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

Introduction

“The United States is one of the few developed countries in the world with an increasing maternal mortality rate.”1

Why the maternal mortality rate in the United States continues to rise is not entirely clear, but appears to be multifactorial. Commentators suggest that the increase is partially associated with the increasing number of pregnant women in the United States who have chronic conditions such as high blood pressure, diabetes, obesity or heart disease.2 A review of NORCAL Group closed claims revealed that mothers who died in the immediate postpartum period usually

had one or more of these conditions, and that their healthcare experiences involved various communication breakdowns and teamwork failures. Research indicates that consistently applied communication and teamwork strategies increase maternal safety,3 which in turn decreases liability risk. Therefore, this article focuses on identifying high-risk conditions and improving communication and teamwork strategies during antepartum, peripartum and postpartum healthcare.

Maternal Death as a Result of Hemorrhage anchor_up

Hemorrhage during labor and delivery is a leading cause of maternal mortality in the United States.2 Maternal hemorrhage emergencies can develop rapidly and without much warning. Following protocols and standardized procedures during these emergencies can increase efficiency and reduce patient injuries.4 The following case study illustrates how, as a postpartum hemorrhage worsens, communication and teamwork failures among members of the delivery team can have fatal results. It also highlights the importance of conducting an appropriate maternal risk assessment, and developing a labor, delivery and postpartum plan consistent with those risks.

Case One

Allegation:

The patient’s death from hemorrhage was preventable.

A morbidly obese, 45-year-old female patient with chronic hypertension and diabetes presented to an obstetrician (OB) for prenatal care. She had undergone two previous uneventful Caesarean section (C-section) deliveries. Ultrasounds revealed that the placenta was anterior and low lying. In her 39th week of pregnancy, the OB admitted the patient to the hospital for a planned C-section. Her blood pressure at admission was 150/69.

The OB delivered a healthy baby without complication. During the C-section, the patient’s placenta was mostly delivered without incident, but the OB had to place his hand between the placenta and uterine wall to detach it. There was no evidence of retained placenta; however, the wall of the uterus was briskly bleeding in various spots. Over the next hour, the OB worked on suturing the uterus to control the bleeding.

Meanwhile, the patient was losing blood. The anesthesiologist estimated blood loss at 2,500 ml, and she was having trouble maintaining the patient’s blood pressure. The anesthesiologist infused 3,500 ml of crystolloid and transfused four units of packed red blood cells following the delivery of the placenta. The anesthesiologist administered two different medications indicated for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage and vasopressors to increase blood pressure. Although the anesthesiologist had indicated to the nurses that she had trouble maintaining the patient’s blood pressure and that the patient’s condition was tenuous, she did not communicate this to the OB.

The OB believed he had stopped the bleeding. He and the assistant surgeon confirmed hemostasis by observation and by flushing the abdomen with saline. They closed the surgical site. At this point, the patient’s blood pressure had risen from a low of 70/40 to 97/34. Following surgery, the patient was lucid, communicating and seemed to be appropriately responding to the transfusions. Unaware of the anesthesiologist’s trouble maintaining the patient’s blood pressure, the OB and assistant surgeon left the surgical suite. The OB went to talk to the patient’s husband.

Forty minutes after the surgery was completed, the patient lost consciousness. A code blue was called, but she could not be resuscitated. Placenta accreta was diagnosed microscopically, which the pathologist concluded was the source of the hemorrhaging.

The patient’s husband and children filed a wrongful death claim against the anesthesiologist, OB, assistant surgeon, nurses and hospital. The plaintiff’s allegations included:

  • The anesthesiologist should have informed the OB that she was having trouble maintaining blood pressure.
  • The OB failed to vigilantly monitor the patient’s status following the C-section, and should have been more thorough in communicating with the anesthesiologist regarding the patient’s status before he left the operating room.
  • The obstetrician failed to recognize the patient needed alternative aggressive measures, possibly including a hysterectomy to control the hemorrhaging. He needed to have a higher index of suspicion.
  • The anesthesiologist failed to adequately communicate the hemodynamic signs of hemorrhage to the obstetrician and failed to call for assistance.
  • The anesthesiologist failed to transfuse enough blood.
  • The anesthesiologist failed to call the obstetrician back to the operating room when she continued to have trouble maintaining the patient’s blood pressure.

Experts were not supportive of the OB’s management of the patient’s labor and delivery. They believed the OB should have suspected placenta accreta based on the position of the patient’s placenta and her history of C-sections. He should have counseled the patient on possible outcomes. Prior to starting surgery, the patient should have had two large bore IVs placed and several units of blood should have been immediately available. His difficulty cleaving the placenta from the uterine wall should have heightened his suspicion of hemorrhage. Although the patient was transfused four units of blood, she most likely continued to bleed, as she did not receive transfusion of platelets and fresh frozen plasma. She had exhausted her supply of platelets and clotting proteins and her blood was unable to clot. She should not have died from a blood loss of 2,500 ml. The medical records provided little support for the OB’s confidence in having stopped the bleeding — they were more indicative of a continuing hemorrhage. Experts further believed the OB should not have accepted the initial hemostasis. Finally, they believed the patient’s chance of survival would have been greater if a hysterectomy had been done.

The OB testified that he would have considered a hysterectomy if he had known the anesthesiologist had been struggling to maintain the patient’s blood pressure. However, the anesthesiologist assumed the OB was aware of her efforts to maintain blood pressure. The OB and anesthesiologist had been working together for many years and had done numerous C-sections together. They were confident the other would effectively accomplish the required tasks during the surgery. Neither felt it was important to keep track of what the other was doing. (An expert who reviewed this case used “failing to see the forest for the trees” to describe how they worked together).

Experts were also critical of the hospital, which should have had an established “Massive Transfusion Protocol” in place to address the patient’s massive bleed.

 

Identifying and Planning for High-Risk Patients anchor_up

Although the prosecution of the foregoing case focused on hemorrhage, this patient presented with a number of health conditions that put her at particular risk for a complicated and potentially dangerous pregnancy and childbirth: morbid obesity, advanced maternal age, heart disease (discovered on autopsy), diabetes and hypertension. The patient’s medical records indicated that the risks associated with these various conditions were never discussed and were not factored into the OB’s prenatal, surgical or post-surgical planning.

Maternal Obesity
Increasing maternal obesity is one of the reasons cited for the rise in the maternal mortality rate in the U.S. (Almost half of the women who become pregnant are overweight or obese, according to CDC studies.5) Obesity-related maternal risks include:6,7

  • Gestational diabetes
  • Preeclampsia
  • Failed trial of labor and C-section
  • Anesthesia complications
  • Blood loss greater than 1,000 ml
  • Venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism
  • Wound breakdowns and infection
  • Difficult epidural placement and intubation

Advanced Maternal Age
The risk of dying from pregnancy complications is more than twice as likely for women over 40 as it is for women aged 20 to 24.5

Heart Conditions
Heart conditions contribute to 25% of pregnancy-related deaths.5 Changes in the circulatory system during delivery and the immediate postpartum period can place overwhelming strain on an abnormal heart.8 Because heart conditions were never discussed with the patient, it is unlikely she would have recognized the symptoms, which can be confused with benign pregnancy-related conditions (e.g., dyspnea on exertion, orthopnea, ankle edema and palpitations).8 Once the patient in this case arrested, experts surmised she had very little reserve, which probably contributed to her inability to survive a cardiac arrest.

 
risk_management_r

Hemorrhage

Communication failures and lack of effective teamwork among the members of a healthcare team are well-recognized barriers to patient safety.9 The foregoing case shows how lack of communication can lead to false assumptions that can undermine patient safety. Effective policies and protocols are a major aspect of ensuring adequate communication and teamwork. However, the best protocol may be useless if it has never been practiced. According to the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), failing to drill on protocols “is similar to a football team that studies its plays but never works through the timing on the practice field.”10 Consider the following recommendations:11,12

Administrators

  • Develop and utilize policies and protocols to identify women at increased risk for maternal hemorrhage.
    • Develop policies and protocols for advising members of the healthcare team about a patient’s elevated risk of hemorrhage.
  • Create a protocol for identifying a hemorrhagic emergency and taking action to control it.
  • Ensure all members of the labor, delivery and recovery teams are trained in accurately assessing and consistently communicating the amount of blood loss.
  • Develop policies and protocols for responding to hemorrhage.
    • Engage frontline staff in the design and approval of hemorrhage policies and procedures.
    • Devote an adequate amount of time for clinicians and staff to learn new protocols.
    • Ensure compliance with policies and protocols.
    • Provide education on the protocols annually and ensure new staff members are appropriately trained.
    • Test the effectiveness and efficiency of protocols and make necessary changes.
    • Include the recovery and early postpartum period in hemorrhage monitoring policies and protocols.
  • Ensure all members of the labor, delivery and recovery team, including nurses, physicians and ancillary staff, participate in drills and simulations, including training as a team, as appropriate.
    • Assess teamwork and communication during simulations and drills.
      • TeamSTEPPS is an evidence-based teamwork system designed to improve communication and teamwork skills among healthcare professionals. Materials are available at: www.ahrq.gov/... (accessed 5/24/2017).
    • Conduct simulations and drills at different times of the day to ensure that appropriate team members and resources are available.
  • Ensure rapid access to equipment/blood and clotting factors.
  • Update protocols in response to findings from obstetrical quality improvement initiatives and updates to clinical guidelines. See, for example, the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) Improving Health Care Response to Obstetric Hemorrhage Toolkit, available at: www.cmqcc.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  • Post protocols for hemorrhage management in delivery rooms or operating suites. The CMQCC Obstetric Hemorrhage Emergency Management Plan Chart is reproduced at the end of this article and is also available online at: www.cmqcc.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017)).
  • Provide checklists, for example, the ACOG Obstetric Hemorrhage Checklist, available at www.acog.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).

Clinicians and Staff

  • Adopt a team mentality during delivery, such that the entire team becomes responsible for assessing the mother’s status and any member speaks up if he or she becomes concerned in any way about a deviation from the normal course of events (i.e., high blood loss).
  • Use protocols and checklists to identify women at increased risk for maternal hemorrhage.
  • Develop a childbirth and postpartum plan specific to the patient’s increased risk of hemorrhage, including:
    • Obtaining a preoperative anesthesia assessment.
    • Scheduling at-risk patient C-sections at times when access to adequate surgical personnel and resources is guaranteed, which might mean scheduling the patient for delivery at a different hospital than originally planned. The surgical team should include:
      • A surgeon with experience and expertise in controlling massive hemorrhage
      • A critical care physician or anesthesiologist experienced with massive hemorrhage to assess organ perfusion and cardiovascular function
      • An onsite hematologist or clinical pathologist to provide blood product advice and coordination of product availability
    • Scheduling the patient for delivery at a hospital that can handle high-risk deliveries.
    • Vigilantly monitoring blood loss during labor and delivery and in the early postpartum period.
  • Ensure all members of the delivery team are aware of a patient’s elevated risk of hemorrhage.
    • Conduct a “team meeting” prior to labor and delivery.
  • If placenta previa or placenta accreta is diagnosed or strongly suspected, counsel the patient about the possibility of hysterectomy and blood transfusion.
  • Use accurate methods for estimating blood loss (e.g., weighing blood on pads/chux) and use accurate suction devices during surgery.
  • Use flow charts, checklists and other documentary materials to prepare for and manage a hemorrhagic emergency. See, for example, the ACOG Guidance Document on Morbidly Adherent Placenta, available at: www.acog.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  • Know where hemorrhagic emergency equipment is and how to use it.
  • Debrief with the entire delivery team after every drill and after every hemorrhagic emergency.

Obstetric Hemorrhage Resources

Resources and guidelines are provided below, and in later pages of this article; however, it is important to remember that emerging scientific and clinical advances result in frequent updates.

  • CMQCC. Improving Health Care Response to Obstetric Hemorrhage, Version 2.0: A California Toolkit to Transform Maternity Care, available at: www.cmqcc.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  • ACOG. Obstetric Hemorrhage Bundle, available at: www.acog.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  • Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN). Postpartum Hemorrhage Project, available at: www.awhonn.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  • Council on Patient Safety in Women’s Healthcare. Obstetric Hemorrhage (+AIM). Available at: safehealthcareforeverywoman.org/...(accessed 5/25/2017).
 
risk_management_r

Maternal Obesity

Research seems to indicate that obese pregnant women are at increased morbidity and mortality risk. Their antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care pathways should take this increased risk into account.13 Consider the following recommendations:14,15,16

  • At the initial prenatal visit and periodically throughout the pregnancy, review appropriate weight gain.
  • Counsel obese patients about how obesity can complicate pregnancy, labor, delivery and postpartum recovery.
    • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists provides patient-oriented obesity educational resources for patients at: www.acog.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  • Offer obese pregnant patients nutrition counseling and urge exercise.
  • Test for diabetes in the first trimester, then repeat testing later in the pregnancy if the results are negative.
  • Create a multidisciplinary team (primary care, OB/GYN, anesthesia, nursing, wound care, dieticians, physical therapy, etc.) to increase patient compliance and safety.
  • Have resources available for obesity-related complications during delivery (e.g., additional blood products, a large operating table and extra personnel in the delivery room).
  • Because of an increased risk of emergent C-section and anesthetic complications among obese patients, consult with anesthesiology early in the labor.
  • Because of an increased risk of thromboembolism in patients undergoing C-section, ensure appropriate thromboprophylaxis.
  • Because of an increased risk of infection, ensure appropriate preoperative antibiotic dosages prior to C-section.
  • Because of an increased risk of wound disruption, ensure appropriate closure of the subcutaneous layer during C-section.
 
risk_management_r

Cardiovascular Disease

Profound changes in maternal circulation during pregnancy can increase morbidity and mortality risk, particularly for women with pre-existing heart conditions.12 Consider the following recommendations:12,17

  • Develop and utilize policies, protocols, checklists and other resources to identify women with or at risk of developing cardiovascular disease symptoms.
  • Know how to distinguish heart conditions from benign pregnancy-related conditions.
  • Teach patients how to recognize the symptoms of cardiac conditions during pregnancy.
    • Counsel patients to report these symptoms to you.
  • When a pregnant patient reports a constellation of symptoms that may signal heart disease, take the necessary measures to rule it out or refer the patient to a specialist.

Maternal Cardiovascular Disease Resources

  • CMQCC. Signs & Symptoms of Heart Disease during Pregnancy and Postpartum. Available at: www.cmqcc.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  • European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Regitz-Zagrosek V. et al. Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. European Heart Journal (2011) 32, 3147–3197. Available at: www.escardio.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
 

Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy anchor_up

Pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders (chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, eclampsia, preeclampsia and preeclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension) are the most common complications of pregnancy in the U.S.18,19 The patient in the following case was diagnosed with HELLP syndrome — H (hemolysis) EL (elevated liver enzymes) LP (low platelet count) — a life-threatening variation of preeclampsia, which usually occurs during the later stages of pregnancy and sometimes after childbirth.20 The case is a tragic reminder of the importance of routine prenatal test follow-up, coordination of care and communication between members of the patient’s healthcare team.

Case Two

Allegation:

Delayed diagnosis of HELLP syndrome resulted in maternal death.

A 37-year-old nulliparous woman presented to a community clinic after a positive home pregnancy test. Other than developing gestational diabetes, which was mostly controlled with medication, her pregnancy progressed normally. At her 37-week appointment, the patient was unable to provide a urine sample prior to being examined by the OB. The medical assistant (MA) told her she could provide her sample after the exam. The MA did not enter the blood pressure reading of 161/87 in the patient's chart immediately, because she was waiting until she had the urinalysis results and wanted to do all of the charting at the same time.

The patient reported no complaints to the OB, who did not notice the absence of urine dipstick results or the blood pressure reading. The OB told the patient to return the following week for a routine examination. Following the examination, the patient provided a urine sample and was told she could leave. The MA noted the presence of 4+ protein in the urine sample. Per clinic policy, the MA had a clinician sign off on the test result. The clinician she chose for this task was a physician’s assistant (PA) who had never examined or treated the patient. The PA did not bring the abnormal result to the attention of the patient's OB.

During the week following the appointment, the patient felt as if she had the flu. She called the OB and described feeling unusually fatigued and nauseous, with a constant dull headache and abdominal pain. The OB agreed with her self-diagnosis of flu. He told her to go to the Emergency Department (ED) if it got worse. As the week wore on, she started to vomit and developed heartburn. Her husband, who also thought she had the flu, became alarmed when her face and extremities became very swollen, and she had trouble taking full breaths. This prompted him to take his wife to the ED. She was diagnosed with HELLP syndrome and scheduled for an immediate C-section. A healthy infant was delivered without complication. Despite heroic efforts on the part of the healthcare team, however, the patient’s condition continued to decline, and she died the next day.

The patient's husband sued the OB, PA and clinic, alleging the OB negligently failed to order follow-up tests after the abnormal lab results were obtained during the week-37 examination, which he claimed would have resulted in a timely diagnosis of HELLP syndrome and the patient's survival.

Had the OB been aware of the abnormal urinalysis, he would have admitted the patient to the hospital and requested a perinatology consult for consideration of immediate delivery. However, as is often the case in medical liability claims, a series of unfortunate decisions converged to result in the patient’s injury.

Physician Assistant: The PA did not think it was her responsibility to inform the OB of the patient’s abnormal urinalysis results when she was asked to sign off on them by the MA. She assumed the OB would check the patient’s medical record. The clinic policies and protocols were not clear regarding her responsibility for communicating abnormal test results for other clinicians’ patients.

Obstetrician: The OB expected abnormal results to be brought to his attention. He could not recall if he noticed the patient had not submitted a urine test when he saw her that day. Because the patient’s pregnancy had been progressing normally and she had no complaints during her exam, he would not have made an extra effort to review her test results, since she would be back the next week. He had another chance to check her file when she called in with flu-like symptoms, but was not prompted to do so because it was flu season.

Patient: The signs of HELLP syndrome can be similar to flu symptoms. Therefore, it was reasonable for the patient to believe she was not severely ill. No one at the clinic had informed her that she was at an increased risk for developing preeclampsia, or what the symptoms were. According to her husband’s testimony, she was conscientious about her health during her pregnancy and spent a great deal of time researching various aspects of her pregnancy online. In his opinion, had she been informed of her high blood pressure reading and 4+ protein in her urine, she would have realized that her lab results were abnormal and would have demanded some sort of intervention.

Defense Expert Opinions

Defense experts were not supportive of the defendants in this case. Their opinions included the following:

  • The patient’s elevated blood pressure and 4+ proteinuria signaled preeclampsia, which required further work-up.
  • It was below the standard of care for the OB not to review the patient’s medical record, especially when the patient was calling about a new complaint.
  • The clinic administrators were negligent for failing to have processes in place to ensure abnormal results were reported to the OB.

Preeclampsia Risk Factors

It is important to take an appropriate medical history to evaluate for risk factors and to evaluate for hypertensive disorders throughout pregnancy.19,21 Risk factors for preeclampsia include:17,18,19

  • Personal or family history of preeclampsia
  • First pregnancy
  • Advanced maternal age (older than 40)
  • Obesity
  • Multifetal pregnancy
  • Long periods between pregnancies
  • Gestational diabetes
  • History of certain conditions, including migraine headaches, diabetes, kidney disease and lupus

The patient in the foregoing case presented with various risk factors for preeclampsia. If she had known, perhaps she would have recognized that her symptoms were related to escalating preeclampsia instead of the flu. Furthermore, if a patient does not know the signs and symptoms of preeclampsia, she is less likely to seek timely treatment. Studies indicate that education specific to reporting signs and symptoms of preeclampsia decrease maternal morbidity and mortality.3

Preeclampsia Resources

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 692, April 2017: Emergent therapy for acute-onset, severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Available at: www.acog.org... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Hypertension in Pregnancy. Available at: www.acog.org... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. First Trimester Risk Assessment for Early-Onset Preeclampsia. Available at: www.acog.org...
  • CMQCC. Preeclampsia Toolkit The toolkit is available at: www.cmqcc.org... (accessed 5/25/2017).
 
risk_management_r

Test Result Communication and Follow-Up

Abnormal test result communication is a well-recognized patient safety issue. Joint Commission patient safety goal NPSG.02.03.01 — “Report critical results of tests and diagnostic procedures on a timely basis”22 — reinforces the importance of this issue, even in settings that do not seek Joint Commission accreditation. In this case, confusing and inconsistent communication policies and clinical practices contributed to the tragic outcome. Consider the following recommendations:

Clinicians and Staff

  • Ensure patients understand what tests were ordered, why the tests were ordered, when results should be expected and what to do in the event of an abnormal result.
  • Communicate test results to the patient, even if they are normal.
  • Bring any deviation from normal to the attention of the clinician in charge. Do not assume that someone else will communicate a critical result to a person who can take action on it.
  • Err on the side of redundancy and follow up on tests you have ordered.
  • Avoid criticizing colleagues or staff for redundant critical results reporting practices.
  • Educate patients about symptoms necessitating immediate follow-up with a clinician.

Administrators

  • Establish clear policies and protocols to ensure abnormal results are appropriately communicated to someone who can take action.
    • Define critical test results
    • Define which results require communication to the ordering physician and the timeframe for doing so.
    • Create a process for communicating critical test results when the ordering physician is not available in the timeframe indicated.
    • Establish clear expectations of responsibility for the communication of test results.
    • Ensure appropriate protocols exist for mid-level practitioners.
  • Build redundancy and back-up systems into test result communication.
  • Fully utilize tools in the electronic health record (EHR) system to ensure timely communication of results.
  • Reduce the number of hand-offs between test ordering and results communication.
  • Establish methods to confirm the effectiveness and implementation of communication policies and procedures.

Test Result Follow Up Resource

NORCAL Risk Management Resource Follow Up Bundle

 

The different stages of pregnancy provide multiple opportunities for healthcare clinicians and staff to lessen morbidity and mortality risks for patients who present with or develop the conditions that can result in maternal mortality. During labor and delivery, robust communication and teamwork policies and protocols are critical. Any deviation from normal should prompt notification of the clinician in charge, and contemporaneous communication is encouraged. Reversing the upward trend of maternal mortality in the U.S. is a job that clinicians can address one pregnancy at a time. Communication and teamwork policies and procedures can increase patient safety if they are appropriately developed and implemented. A vital aspect of any protocol implementation is practicing it and fine tuning it to best achieve optimal results. Clinicians, staff and administrators are encouraged to consider and, where appropriate, implement the risk management and patient safety strategies introduced in this month’s publication.

| Special thanks to Kurt Wharton, MD, for reviewing this article.

title_endnotes

The NORCAL documents referenced in this article, along with many other Risk Management Resource documents and past editions of the Claims Rx, are available in the Risk Solutions area of MyACCOUNT, or by policyholder request at 855.882.3412.

  1. Arora SK, et al. Triggers, bundles, protocols, and checklists—what every maternal care provider needs to know. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2016;214(4):444-451.
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System. (Updated: January 31, 2017) Available at: www.cdc.gov/... (accessed 5/23/2017).
  3. California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC). Preeclampsia Toolkit. Available at: www.cmqcc.org/... (accessed 5/23/2017).
  4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Patient safety in the surgical environment. Committee Opinion No. 464. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:786–90. (reaffirmed 2014) Available at: www.acog.org/... (accessed 5/23/2017).
  5. CDC. At A Glance 2016: Maternal Health. Available at: www.cdc.gov/... (accessed 5/23/2017).
  6. Catalano PM, Shankar K. Obesity and pregnancy: mechanisms of short term and long term adverse consequences for mother and child. BMJ 2017; 356:j1.
  7. Fyfe EM, Thompson JM, Anderson NH, Groom KM, McCowan LM. Maternal obesity and postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal and caesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2012;12:112. Available at: bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/... (accessed 5/23/2017).
  8. Mohamad TN, et al. Cardiovascular Disease and Pregnancy. (Updated January 10, 2017.) Available at: emedicine.medscape.com/... showall (accessed 5/24/2017).
  9. Teamwork and Communication Working Group. Canadian Framework for Teamwork and Communication: Literature Review, Needs Assessment, Evaluation of Training Tools and Expert Consultations. Edmonton (AB): Canadian Patient Safety Institute; 2011. Available at: www.patientsafetyinstitute.ca... (accessed 5/23/2017).
  10. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), District II. Optimizing Protocols in Obstetrics: Management of Obstetric Hemorrhage. Oct. 2012. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/... (accessed 5/23/2014).
  11. ACOG. Obstetric Hemorrhage Bundle. Available at: www.acog.org/... (accessed 5/23/2017).
  12. Schumann NL, et al. A review of national health policies and professional guidelines on maternal obesity and weight gain in pregnancy. Clinical Obesity 2014 4; 197–208.
  13. CMQCC. Improving Health Care Response to Obstetric Hemorrhage, Version 2.0: A California Toolkit to Transform Maternity Care. Available at: www.cmqcc.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  14. Buschur E, Kim C. Guidelines and interventions for obesity during pregnancy. International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2012;119(1):6-10. Available at: www.ncbi...(accessed 5/25/2017).
  15. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obesity in pregnancy. Practice Bulletin 156. Obstet Gynecol 2015:126(6)112e-126e.
  16. Davies, Gregory AL, et al. SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline: Obesity in Pregnancy. Feb. 2010;239:165-173. Available at: https://sogc.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  17. Naderi S, Raymond R. Pregnancy and Heart Disease. Feb. 2014. Available at: www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  18. CDC. Data on Selected Pregnancy Complications in the United States. (Updated: October 19, 2016) Available at: www.cdc.gov/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  19. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Hypertension in Pregnancy. Available at: www.acog.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  20. Mayo Clinic. Preeclampsia. Available at: www.mayoclinic.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  21. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Final Recommendation Statement: Preeclampsia Screening. April 2017. Available at: www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).
  22. The Joint Commission. National Patient Safety Goals. 2017. Hospital Accreditation Program. www.jointcommission.org/... (accessed 5/25/2017).

Used from David Lagrew, MD, Shield, L, Main E, Cape V. (California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative Toolkit to Transform Maternity Care) Obstetric Hemorrhage Toolkit: Improving Health Care Response to Obstetric Hemorrhage. (California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative Toolkit to Transform Maternity Care) Developed under contract #11-10006 with the CDPH/MCAH Division; Published by the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, 3/17/15.

 
Norcal Mutual
www.norcalmutual.com